2010
USA 2001
Compared to the original there are some nice things in this film, but it is
missing the pizzazz that the original did have, which this one does not.
The original, did not spend too much time telling us what the symbols meant, or
making any judgments about the events in the film. By just being the unusual
story it was, and making analogies that not everything in this universe will
always be understood, it stood out as a film that was reminiscent of the earlier
surrealistic movement. It showed everything it thought and it hoped for the
best. The end result, were more questions that answers, but in the process it
gave us a visual display that we had never encountered before.
2010, is not the visual display that the original was. It seems to have a chip
on its shoulder, in that it has to say something, where the other film didn't
have to. The difference might just be the director, one who enjoys shooting, and
not make judgments, and the other who is merely an example of what most
directors are nowadays, and should not be, if they are going to help the
industry develop its art form. What this film is missing is Stanley Kubrick. It
can never do any better than to make a political crap shoot with the crews and
with the situation at hand. And end the film with a soft bit related to fear.
There are some nice bits in the story, and the best is the idea that there is
some "spirit" form, or, something, which is relaying messages and is warning
them that they need to leave. And the spirit form is connected to Dave Goldman,
who originally shut down Hal 9000, and basically stopped the mission from
completing. At least, we are given a few directions and understandings of what
DID happen in the original film that had not been clear. The computer did not
like the changes in the program, since it had been built to follow ONE specific
line of thinking. Heck, we humans are the same.
But this time, the crews of the spaceship, do agree that there is some danger
and that they need to leave, and one technician does manage to discuss with Hall
9000 what is needed. The computer thanks him for the honesty, which before
didn't exist. In other words, we created a monster, but we didn't treat him with
the respect that we should have. Mary Shelley is alive and well in space.
Aside from the attempt to force a friendship during the days of the cold war,
the film is not bad. At the time, these situations were rather pathetic. And the
event that forces a peace in the earth, are not the people themselves, but a
stellar event, which scares more humans into submission and perhaps to forget
their difference.
Roy Scheider is nice, as is Helen Mirren as the Russian commander of the
expedition. In a smaller role, not so well defined, but could have been better
used, is Bob Baladan as the scientist that is programming Hal and its
successors. He is in a role that doesn't allow him a chance to look bigger and
better, and he does feel better than the others. Perhaps it is because his role
IS defined, and the others are not.
2010 is not a bad film. It just lacks the punch that the other one did have.
2001, the original, did not elaborate in the political and philosophical
opinions. This film does not know how to do anything except explore those bits,
and eventually demean the nice ideals that one film had created, but which could
not be sustained. Or maybe the writer just didn't want to repeat himself. Either
way, this film is not as good as the first. It could even do better than use the
same music.
Nice film, but a bit behind the times, by the time it came out. The original,
was just that... an original. This did not make it that close ... and it was
missing the most important part of it all ... the design of the film did not
know how to use the music ... it's just another conventional film. I've always
had this idea that Stanley Kubrick's original was more of a dream than it was
anything else ... and we can always get rid of all the meanings and whatnots
that many people like to associate with it. In the end, in the history of time,
they are all meaningless anyway ... but the second that you hear the music pound
you into remembering it ... is worth a lot more.
3.5 GIBLOONS
DIRECTOR: PETER HYAMS
CINEMATOGRAPHY: Peter Hyams
MUSIC: David Shire
CAST: Roy Scheider, John Lithgow, Helen Mirren, Bob Balaban, Keir Dullea,
Douglas Rain
WRITTEN BY: Arthur C. Clarke
ONE WORD: Sure misses Stanley Kubrick.
Australia/New Zealand England France Germany Italy Mexico Russia South America Spain USA
Please email me with questions and/or comments
Pages Copyright ©
2009/2010/2011/2012/2013/2014/2015 Pedro Sena -- Last modified:
07/26/2023