Mike Oldfield - Changeling
The Autobiography
As Mike himself says, biographies are often ... not exactly what we thought they
might be, and the nice thing about "Changeling" is that while it is a biography,
in many ways, it comes off as a kind of diary of thoughts and ideas, and when I
first read it, the book did not hit me much, but a few months later, reading it
again, the book lined up a lot more than I thought, and in fact, I think that I
myself felt like I reacted ... with a sort of mental panic attack!
It is a detailed account of his younger days, pretty much through the album
"Tubular Bells" and some more beyond that, although after the putting together
of that album, the book seems to have a bit less interest, since it took so much
to get to the story of the first album. In some ways, I thought I did not find
out enough about the following albums, and some other things that he has put
together, up to and including his being on stage again ... which description
seems like it goes ... whiff ... gone ... at least compared to the earlier
discussion and pretty much first two thirds of the book.
At least, though, you get a very good sense of the time and place, and how the
school system affected Mike during his young days. His parents get a large
amount of time and space, however, his learning guitar and some music, was
almost all by himself, by recognizing the mathematical design of the whole thing
and how some folks were able to work it, and his comments on classical music are
magnificent, and he clarifies that he really wanted to create music like that,
not just a rock song.
A part of the book is about his inner self and how he has come to grips with it.
he does spend an honest amount of time discussing his therapies and internal
thoughts, and these, while important to the music, and how it was designed, is
hard for many of us to read, as one can feel despondent, and then wonder ... how
the heck can he do that? Hard to believe that he can get a guitar pill, and off
to the races every thing goes.
It is, a very different book, from most biographies, in that this is not quite
about the crazy musician that clamors for fame, and for the most part, he just
wants to be alone, and he discusses his fun with a lot of reviewers and how
frustrated he got with most of them. Sometimes, many of us prefer the quiet
space, and maintain the study and look and continuity of our own inner thing.
For Mike this inner thing was problematic, but he took a while to connect that
to his music, and make sense of it. As an example, for me, it is all about that
inner movie and its continuity and my ability to translate it ... and I really
do not seem to worry too much about its connections to the past and some of
those events, even if some of them are clear for me, that connection would be
way too esoteric for anyone else to relate to or understand anyway, so I tend to
not concentrate on that so much.
In the end, it is an interesting book, and quite far and away from the books
about "stars", which makes it different, and I had to read it a second time a
few months later, because the first time, the book simply did not click, and
was, for me, a bit of a turn off. I had not quite connected his experiences to
the music, mostly because I had my own "movie" to just about all of his music,
thus, his own "movie" was not exactly important, even if what I was seeing was
more from his experience than mine, which I have figured it to be about a 50/50.
Good book to read, but a bit serious and the stuff around the therapies is
something that I would prefer not to have, or discuss, but that was a part of
Mike's therapies that helped him get his life and work done.
But what great music, it helped define! Very nice book, although I am not sure I
would consider it great.
One last item, and it is what I would consider an odd one, but it is something
that goes against the definition and grain by most websites these days, and it
is that Mike considers his music "progressive" and that is a bit different than
what is considered "progressive" these days, and it might, somewhere along the
line, add some more discussion to the topic, which needs to be done anyway.
"Progressive" as is defined right now, is not even about the music ... it's
about a format for a top ten like design for others to follow, and that is not
an appropriate definition for "music", specially individualized and special
works, as those that Mike has created all his life.
(More added later ... )
One other detail about Mike's book, that
probably needs a mention ... he tells us that one of the weird things in the
business is that there were not, after "Tubular Bells" a huge influx of music
and materials that were longer and more experimental.
Actually, I would like to correct Mike on that ... there were many experimental
and different things done, but they were not done in America or England ... and
I have always thought that the reason why is that the music "business" in those
two countries is so designed to grab money in any way it can, and many record
companies, and the only thing missing is for Mike to mention their names (...
which would be un-professional, but needs to be done ...) to help expose the
folks that are in the business to make money and completely disrespect the
artists and the music ... for the hit.
This is a problem, even for a "popular" website, that even has a "top ten" for
their folks to entertain themselves, but in the end, it hurts the interest and
the ability to listen to something else that is not known or discussed. The
reverse of it all, is that a lot of this music (at least Mike's ... no one
discusses Ryuichi, or others!) is NOW, many years later, finally recognized, but
the "business" is still not helping different artists coming around and bringing
out different music, and a lot of the comments, and reviews, have a tendency to
not appreciate anything that is ... I call it "classical music minded", though
it does not have to be defined by that music at all, and be much more free form.
To me, what killed the Fillmore's and the American music scene from the 60's was
... the music business and record companies. They were the ones that refused the
extended material ... so they could have a "hit" for the radio. At least,
England, made room for a lot of these side artists, though many of them never
were that famous, but many of them, have made an amazing history of their
material and work, because the artistic side of it was allowed to express itself
... and this was NEVER DONE in California, or New York (try it in Memphis!), and
as such .. the best you get is 3 minute cuts by The Ramones. Nice to party with,
but not a whole lot of music there!
Please email me with questions and/or comments
Pages Copyright ©
2009/2010/2011/2012/2013/2014/2015/2016/2017 Pedro Sena -- Last modified:
03/21/2020