PETER'S FRIENDS
ENGLAND 1992
( Side note.. interesting that I would catch this the same evening that I saw
Glengarry Glen Ross .... pure theatre. )
If Glengarry Glen Ross was American acting styles at its very best, then Peter's
Friends is the English version of the same thing. The finest ensemble style
acting that you will find, is in both of these productions. American filmdom is
afraid of these PLAY things. The English, of course, have thrived on it for a
long time.
And Peter's Friends, despite its down ending ( not quite ), is a play that does
not need a movie. But Kenneth Branagh manages to make it
enjoyable, and not an evening of heavy theatre, until the last possible moment,
which is nice, and makes for a fun evening. One has no clue as to what is going
on, or what will happen. So much the better.
Peter's Friends, centers around a group of buddies that used to spend their
college days doing little reviews for parties, with some burlesque
thrown in. Several years later, all the members have gone their own way. Peter
has decided that he will have a party to honor all of his friends, the last
chance that he might have to do so, for he is also losing the properties he
lives in.
And they arrive. The actor and his wife actress, frustrated because he is the
star and she has to stick around with him until she gets her own break. The
spinster, who still picks up a bum here and there, and is trying to find
something of a spark in a relationship, to excuse her sexual escapades. The
successful businessman in the advertising business, who is good, but has a wife
that is just about gone haywire about her child. And Maggie, who seems intended
on coming over to the party to hook Peter into marriage.
And their interplay gets everyone in trouble with everyone, and insulting
everyone else in the process, but never losing the sense of friendship which
brought them together in the first place. Like many years ago, they still tease
each other about their sexual anything, and their choice of mates, compared to
their choice of friends ( never in question, now is it.? ).
And the disappointments set in everywhere. Peter is not responding to Maggie's
advances, and she is hurt by it. Sarah is still trying to bed down the actor (
specially now ), and to get rid of the cold fish American wife, who spells out
clearly she is in it just to get her own chance at acting. And Paul, whose
marriage may have meant something at one time, but has been a terrible disaster
since the death of one of the twin sons. His wife has turned into a neurotic
mess since.
All's well that ends well, is the norm here, and we won't disappoint anyone with
a spoiler's alert. Needless to say that this film is excellent, and the acting
is above and beyond the call of any one's duty, and that it is a very enjoyable
evening, the likes of which many of us would love to have once in a while (
well, we can forget the news.! ), just to appreciate old friends, who really
were better friends than we give them credit for, much later.
The best one in this ensemble is Stephen Fry as Peter. The smooth one is Emma
Thompson. The most boring one is Kenneth Branagh. But
the film is excellent, and very enjoyable, and allows a theatrical play to live,
without having to resort to filmdom's very famous close ups. Theatre still
lives, even if through the lens on a camera.
4 GIBLOONS
DIRECTOR:
KENNETH BRANAGH
CINEMATOGRAPHY: ROGER LAUSER
MUSIC: Eighties material
CAST: Kenneth Branagh (Andrew), Stephen Fry (Peter), Alphonsia Emmanuel (Sarah), Hugh
Laurie (Roger), Phyllida Law (Vera), Alex Lowe (Paul), Rita Rudner (Carol), Emma
Thompson (Maggie)
SUPER FEATURES: Acting, of course. Graduate
Variety.
Please email me with questions and/or comments
Pages Copyright ©
2009/2010/2011/2012/2013/2014/2015/2016 Pedro Sena -- Last modified:
04/26/2022